Legal Opinion

Weidner v. Hyland

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed June 5, 1934:

Fowler, J.

The defendants appeal because they were not awarded judgment upon the counter-claim. The plaintiff *15appeals because he was not allowed recovery of the initial payment of $1,000. The original defendant Geo. W. Hy-land is hereinafter referred to as the vendor.

1. The decision of the case turns on the meaning of two provisions of the contract, reading as follows:(1) “If the buyer fails to perform his part of this, agreement, his earnest payment shall be forfeited to the sellers.”(2) “The sellers agree to furnish the buyer with a merchantable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woodman v. Blue Grass Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hammond v. Capital City Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Artzerounian v. DemetriadesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Hannon v. KellyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Davis v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LockhartAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wenzel v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API