Weidner v. Hyland
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed June 5, 1934:
Fowler, J.
The defendants appeal because they were not awarded judgment upon the counter-claim. The plaintiff *15appeals because he was not allowed recovery of the initial payment of $1,000. The original defendant Geo. W. Hy-land is hereinafter referred to as the vendor.
1. The decision of the case turns on the meaning of two provisions of the contract, reading as follows:(1) “If the buyer fails to perform his part of this, agreement, his earnest payment shall be forfeited to the sellers.”(2) “The sellers agree to furnish the buyer with a merchantable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woodman v. Blue Grass Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Hammond v. Capital City Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Artzerounian v. DemetriadesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Hannon v. KellyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Davis v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis v. LockhartAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Wenzel v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940