Jenness v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Rome
Supreme Court of the United States
IN ERROR ■ TO THE CIKCUIT COURT. FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP ' MICHIGAN.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite
The judgment in this case is for $1,215.16, but it appears affirmatively on the face of the record that of this amount $2,669.03 was not disputed below. The defence related alone to the difference between these two amounts, which is less than $5,000. The dispute here is only in reference, to the amount contested below. Such being the case, we have no jurisdiction. The cases of Gray v. Blanchard, 97 U. S. 564; Tintsman v. national Bank, 100 U. S. 6; and Hilton v. Dickinson, 108 U. S. 165, are conclusive to this effect.
Dismissed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hilton v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Gray v. BlanchardSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Tintsman v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
3Cited by15 opinions
- New England Mortgage Security Co. v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Municipality of Rio Piedras v. Serra, Garabis & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
- Gorman v. HavirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- People of the Territory v. ThiedeUtah Supreme Court · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.