Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEYGENERAL OF~TEXAS -c.yInn AUSTIN -- Secretary bf State Austin, 'Pexaa Attention1 I&. Fi'ank D. Dear Mz’.Lwaon$ 5 “*The aorporatlondoes not pmpose to qualify in your state an a forei,gnaoxqoration, nor do any tntraatatebualnees thers, but pro- poses, however, to aolialt offers for the pur- chase of royaltiesby resident nalesmn who 888 Honorable Wll~lam J. kuf~on. Page 2 deduct comtrilerionra and remit the net oum with said of+rs, for rooeptanaeor rejeatlon,by the comDaJly+ln Vyomlng.* ” “The form or offer of puruhme to be used by such cowany is enclosed herewith. “This…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Chattanooga National Building & Loan Ass'n v. DensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bartlett v. DohertyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1935