Legal Opinion

Neeson v. Sangamon County Mining Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1925No. 15658. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice

Duncan delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant in error, Richard Neeson, filed his bill in the circuit court of Sangamon county against the Sangamon County Mining Company and W. A. Brewerton for an accounting, to ascertain the amount due him for services while acting as superintendent of their coal mining business under a written contract of employment. The defendants answered the bill, and the issues were referred to the master in chancery to take and report the evidence and his conclusions of law and fact. The master reported, and found that the defendant in error…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Di Palma v. WeinmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Selz v. BuelIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Thurston v. HamblinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Crawford v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. City of Erie v. Erie Gas & Mineral Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matzen v. Hugoton Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. International Hotel Co. v. LibbeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  3. Finazzo v. Mid-States Finance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Atkins v. Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API