Legal Opinion

Euler v. Euler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1989No. 39A01-8808-CV-00259PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Respondent in dissolution proceeding appeal from judgment in favor of the petitioner regarding the division of marital property. We affirm in part and remand.

FACTS

David and Mary Euler were married on January 21, 1983. Each party had been married previously, and neither party adopted the other’s children from the prior marriages. No children were born of David and Mary Euler’s marriage. Throughout the marriage, Mary worked as a waitress; David first worked at Cummins Engine Company but was unable to continue employment because of ill health. At the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chestnut v. ChestnutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Schnarr v. SchnarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SnemisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Cowart v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Scott v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Cox v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Balvich v. Balvich (In Re Balvich)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API