State v. Sanders
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentBernstein, Justice
In the unusual posture of this case, I dissent solely on the ground that the court is deciding what appears to be, in practical effect, a moot question. The original declaration of forfeiture is non-existent, never having matured to the point where a judgment could be entered pursuant to Rule 73 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, and having been declared, instead, “of no effect” ; and the bonds have been “exonerated.” Now, the criminal cause having been dismissed, it is too late to declare a forfeiture of the bonds, the liability of the insurer having been terminated. State v. Veterans of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 1856Supreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- State ex rel. Gabe v. MainWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- All Florida Surety Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1955