Legal Opinion
Smith v. Hudson
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1823PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The Sheriff of Rensselaer, under a fi. fa. issued in this ’ J f . cause, had sold three parcels of land, belonging to the defendant, to Reilay, one of the plaintiffs, but in the certificate of sale which he had made and filed,, by-mistake, had omitted to mention one of these parcels.
1Opinion of the Court
T/tc Court, on motion, in behalf of Reilay, ordered the Sheriff to amend his certificate, by inserting therein, that he had also sold the parcel omitted,
R.ule accordingly.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Dunn v. ArkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Waring v. WaringNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- Richards v. VarnumNew York Supreme Court · 1852