Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Quay

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1903No. Docket No. 39PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Replevin by Frank J. Haynes, Fred R. Haynes, and William J. Haynes, copartners as F. J. Haynes & Company, against Lafayette Quay, Edward Quay, and George Quay, copartners as D. Quay & Sons, John A. Jamieson and Thomas Woodffeld, copartners doing business as the Neebish Lumber Company, Briggs & Cooper Company, Limited, and the Michigan Central Railroad Company.

Read the full summary

Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Replevin by Frank J. Haynes, Fred R. Haynes, and William J. Haynes, copartners as F. J. Haynes & Company, against Lafayette Quay, Edward Quay, and George Quay, copartners as D. Quay & Sons, John A. Jamieson and Thomas Woodffeld, copartners doing business as the Neebish Lumber Company, Briggs & Cooper Company, Limited, and the Michigan Central Railroad Company. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This is a replevin suit for two car loads of shingles, which it was claimed plaintiffs bought *230from the Neebish Lumber Company, a copartnership composed of defendants Jamieson and Wood field. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ case the trial court directed a verdict for the defendants on the ground that the title to said shingles had not passed to the plaintiffs. The only question presented on this appeal is whether or not that ruling was correct.

According to the testimony of the plaintiffs, the terms of their contract, by which they acquired their rights to said shingles, are contained in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. CrowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Jenkinson v. Monroe Bros. & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Brewer v. Michigan Salt Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Henningsen Produce Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Peters, White & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Hydrex Silent Exhaust Works v. Seager Engine WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Day Pulverizer Co. v. FittsTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API