Legal Opinion

In Interest of Rasmussen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1990No. 89-1306PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Appellant, Steven Jon Rasmussen, seeks to set aside his involuntary civil commitment to a mental health facility. We reverse, and remand the cause with directions to vacate the commitment.

We first note that appellant’s brief fails to assign any specific error. Appellant’s sole assignment of error recites: “The District Court erred in affirming the Mental Health Board’s Commitment Order.” Such “generalized and vague assertions do not advise this court of the issues submitted for decision.” Coyle v. Janssen, 212 Neb. 785, 786, 326 N.W.2d 44, 45 (1982). In such a circumstance, the decision…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re Interest of BlythmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Houska v. City of WahooNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Coyle v. JanssenNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Kraemer v. Mental Health BoardNebraska Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of SBNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Abdullah v. GunterNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Headrick v. Adams County Mental Health BoardNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. In Re Interest of VanceNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re GhNebraska Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API