Legal Opinion

State v. Salamanca

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 29, 2013No. 1 CA-CR 12-0749PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSEN, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Roberto Alejandro Salamanca argues the superior court erred by admitting two text messages he sent moments before he *294crashed his car into another vehicle, fatally injuring the other driver. We affirm the court’s ruling that one text message was intrinsic to the charged crimes and conclude the other was admissible pursuant to Arizona Rule of Evidence 404(b).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Driving along Route 66 toward downtown Flagstaff, Salamanca weaved in and out of traffic at about twice the posted speed limit.1 He lost control of his sport utility…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. MottArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. AguilarArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. FerreroArizona Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stafford v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. State v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. Stafford v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. State v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API