Legal Opinion

Faro v. Highway Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1996No. 92-01-34624; CA A86430PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of our opinion, reversing and remanding the judgment in his favor in this wrongful discharge and unlawful employment practice action. Faro v. Highway Division, 143 Or App 388, 923 P2d 1298 (1996). We allow reconsideration and adhere to the opinion.

Although we decided several issues in the case, plaintiffs motion is directed solely against our conclusion that defendant’s fourth assignment of error was sufficiently preserved and presented for our review on the merits. Defendant argued in that assignment that the court erred byrefusing to give a requested…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Robinson v. Children's Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Faro v. Highway DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Faro v. Highway DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API