Legal Opinion

Bacon-McMillan Veneer Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 13, 1930No. Docket No. 34611Published

1. Under the facts held that, for the purpose of determining the depreciation deduction of a plant under the unit-of-production method, the timber acquired in 1923 should be considered as available in 1922. 2. Held that a dividend of a definite amount paid in Liberty bonds of a value in excess of cost gives rise to taxable gain.

1Opinion of the Court

BACON-MCMILLAN VENEER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Bacon-McMillan Veneer Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 34611.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

20 B.T.A. 556; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2091;

August 13, 1930, Promulgated

1. Under the facts held that, for the purpose of determining the depreciation deduction of a plant under the unit-of-production method, the timber acquired in 1923 should be considered as available in 1922.

2. Held that a dividend of a definite amount paid in Liberty bonds of a value in excess of cost gives rise to taxable gain.

George E. H. Goodner, Esq.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bacon-McMillan Veneer Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API