Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Scranton, M. & B. R.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1935No. 694PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

The first and final account of the receivers was confirmed Nisi, and at the same time a rule was granted by this court to show cause why the account should not be confirmed absolutely. Before the return day of the rule, exceptions were filed to the account by the Miners’ National Bank of Wilkes Barre, trustee under the mortgage of the Scranton, Montrose & Binghamton Railroad Company, the defendant, and before the return day of the rule exceptions were filed to the account by the commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

The receivers’ account shows that after the payment of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Bauer v. Wilkes-Barre Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. City Bank of Wheeling v. BryanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Petersburg Sav. & Ins. v. DellatorreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Malm v. Home Riverside Coal Mines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. In re Long Island R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1951
  3. Parks v. Central Door & Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API