Legal Opinion

Joseph v. United States Department of Labor

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 3, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 90-3060PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GESELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are two United States farm workers who bring this action challenging a decision of defendant United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) that it would not set a prevailing wage rate for seed cane cutters in the Florida sugar cane industry for the now completed harvest year 1990-1991. See Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended by Immigration Reform and Control Act *246of 1986, P.L. 99-603; 20 C.F.R. §§ 655.-102(b)(9), 653.501(d)(4). Plaintiffs contend that DOL’s failure to set a prevailing wage deprived them of a higher…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. NAACP, Jefferson County Branch v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  2. Walso Wint v. Hon. Clayton K. YeutterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Comite De Apoyo A Los Trabajadores Agricolas (Cata) v. United States Department Of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  2. Comite de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agricolas v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Joseph v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API