Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Gornish v. Flick (In Re Flick)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiff, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania [hereinafter referred to as the Commonwealth] seeks a determination that the Bankruptcy Act does not prohibit its enforcement of certain outstanding judgments against the defendant-debtor, and, in the alternative, the Commonwealth prays that this Court lift the stay imposed by Rule 401 of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure [hereinafter cited as Bankruptcy Rules] to permit the Commonwealth to con tinue contempt enforcement proceedings against the debtor. 1 For reasons hereinafter set forth, we conclude that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Brocker v. BrockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- In re AbramsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Commonwealth by Packel v. ZiomekCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Bartle v. Flick (In Re Flick)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Rose v. Gedeon (In Re Gedeon)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983
- Erlin Manor Nursing Home, Inc. v. Rate Setting CommissionUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
- New Jersey, Division of Motor Vehicles v. Graham (In Re Graham)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988