Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Gornish v. Flick (In Re Flick)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 14, 1980No. 19-11232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania [hereinafter referred to as the Commonwealth] seeks a determination that the Bankruptcy Act does not prohibit its enforcement of certain outstanding judgments against the defendant-debtor, and, in the alternative, the Commonwealth prays that this Court lift the stay imposed by Rule 401 of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure [hereinafter cited as Bankruptcy Rules] to permit the Commonwealth to con tinue contempt enforcement proceedings against the debtor. 1 For reasons hereinafter set forth, we conclude that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
  3. Brocker v. BrockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. In re AbramsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  5. Commonwealth by Packel v. ZiomekCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Bartle v. Flick (In Re Flick)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Rose v. Gedeon (In Re Gedeon)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  3. Erlin Manor Nursing Home, Inc. v. Rate Setting CommissionUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
  4. New Jersey, Division of Motor Vehicles v. Graham (In Re Graham)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API