Legal Opinion
United States v. Quary
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 6, 2018No. 17-3193PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
2Per curiam
James Wardell Quary, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to challenge the district court’s dismissal of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for lack of jurisdiction. We deny a COA and dismiss this matter.
After a jury convicted Quary of multiple drug offenses, he received a life sentence. He also received a consecutive term of 60 months’ imprisonment for a firearm offense. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). His convictions and sentences were affirmed on direct appeal. See United States v. Quary, 188 F.3d 520,…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Juan White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Stanko v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Charles A. Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. McKinneyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Brewer v. RegaladoDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- Hahn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
- Hendrix v. BridgesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.