Arthur v. Martin

HOWERTON, Judge.

The Arthurs appeal from a judgment of the Laurel Circuit Court which awarded a disputed 15-acre tract of land to the Martins. The Arthurs contend that the court erred by finding that the Martins had a superior title or a right to the property by adverse possession. While we agree that some of the court’s findings are erroneous, we nevertheless conclude that it reached the correct result. A correct decision will not be reversed on appeal merely because it is based on incorrect grounds or reasons. Tresslar Co., Inc. v. Fritts, Ky.App., 665 S.W.2d 314 (1984). We affirm the…