Legal Opinion

Murdock. v. Follansbee Steel Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 15, 1954No. 11240_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

Is a beneficial owner of stock registered for business convenience in another’s name a “holder” of such stock within the purview of a state statute requiring, in certain circumstances, posting of security for expenses in a shareholder’s derivative action?

That is the primary issue, of first impression, presented by this appeal.

The undisputed facts may be summarized as follows:

The plaintiff, Rex Murdock, a resident of New Mexico, owned more than five per cent of the stock of the corporate defendant, Follansbee Steel Corporation (“Fol-lansbee”), a Delaware corporation.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Shielcrawt v. MoffettNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Gallup v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  5. H F G Co. v. Pioneer Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gaudiosi v. MellonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  2. Shapiro v. MagazinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Thomas P. Knapp v. Bankers Securities Corporation Appeal of Bankers Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. STATE EX REL. HABERKORN v. DeKalb Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Matthies v. Seymour Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API