Legal Opinion

Bell v. Shannon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1963PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

In this suit the complainants seek a construction of the wills of John and Angusta McMurry. Their heirs at law are made defendants, together with the District. Attorney General who was included as a necessary party because the action involved a charitable trust, and Robertson County, Tennessee whose interest will be made to appear in this opinion.

Thirteen of said heirs at law appeal from the action of the Chancellors in overruling their demurrer and assign errors.

The pleadings show that John McMurry was born and reared in Robertson County, Tennessee. During the later years of his life he…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jourolmon v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Heiskell v. Chickasaw LodgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hoggatt v. CloptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Henshaw v. FlennikenTennessee Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. In Re Estate of McFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Presley v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  5. Daugherty v. DaughertyTennessee Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API