Pullen v. Baltzer
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.
The first two counts in the declaration are for the recovery of a certain sum as commission for finding a purchaser of the capital stock of the L. L. Bates Company, all of which was owned by, the defendant, Baltzer. The trial judge directed a verdict for Baltzer on these counts; and the correctness of that ruling is not now before us. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff on the third count; which is upon an account annexed for services rendered and work and labor performed. The main exception of the defendant is to the refusal of the judge to direct a verdict for him on this count.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cadigan v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Noyes v. CaldwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Leonard v. EldridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Ballou v. United Button Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Bemister v. HedtlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Ball v. WilliamsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Haber v. Bond Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949