State v. Deschamps

(concurring) : I feel constrained by the cases of State v. Nance, 25 S. C., 168. State v. Jackson, 36 S. C., 487; 15 S. E., 559; 31 Am. St. Rep., 890. State v. Anderson, 59 S. C., 229; 37 S. E., 820. State v. Gadsden, 70 S. C., 430; 50 S. E., 16. State v. Latimer, 88 S. C., 79; 70 S. E., 409. State v. Bundy, 24 S. C., 439; 58 Am. Rep., 263, and State v. Paulk, 18 S. C., 514, to concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Watts, although I must say that if it were an open question I would take the contrary view.

I think that there is a very great difference between what are denominated the…