Legal Opinion

In re City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.

This is a condemnation proceeding for the acquiring of property along the Harlem river from East Ninety-second street to East One Hundred and Twenty-second street. The property taken includes land and land under water. The proceeding is somewhat unusual, as many of the parcels involve serious questions of title which must be determined before any quantum figures are arrived at.

*746The city of New York is or was the owner of the land under water between high- and low-water mark throughout the length of this proceeding. It derived title to this tideway by the Dongan…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Jackson v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Appleby v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Sage v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Mulry v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. AdkissonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Normanoch Association, Inc. v. BaldasannoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. United States v. 53¼ Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  5. In re Burns Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API