Briggs v. . Davis

This is a motion by the appellant for a reargument. The facts in the case and the judgment given at the last September term, are stated in the report in 20 N. Y., p. 16. The appellant’s counsel insists that the court fell into an error in fixing the terms upon which a redemption should be allowed. We held that in order to redeem, the appellant, as the representative of the North American Trust and Banking Company, must pay the amount found due the representatives of Joel Dorman; but the defendant maintains that he ought only to be required to pay the amount bid for the premises, and interest.…