Legal Opinion

Kowalsky v. Kerrigan

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1901No. S.F. No. 2788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PETITION for writ of mandate to a Judge of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco to settle a bill of exceptions. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an original petition here for a writ of mandamus to require the defendant, as judge, to settle a certain bill of exceptions.

In an action entitled Reed v. Kowalsky (the petitioner herein), a judgment had heen rendered in defendant’s court in favor of plaintiff therein, and the court had dismissed a proceeding instituted therein by petitioner for a new trial, and this present petition is for a writ of mandamus to compel the judge to settle a bill of exceptions to the order dismissing the motion for a new trial.

The defendant refused to settle the bill, upon the ground that it,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawley v. LeClairWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Reid v. KowalskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Reid v. KowalskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API