McGuinness v. State
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Chief Justice.
The questions presented for review are: Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that the deposition of the State’s chief witness was properly admitted in this criminal trial under the applicable procedural rules? Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that such admission did not violate defendant’s right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him? We hold that the Court of Appeals erred in holding the deposition was properly admitted.
Defendant was charged with second-degree murder. Prior to trial and at the State’s request, the deposition of a Ben…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- State v. BarelaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. BerryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Haynes v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Allen v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. ZamarripaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BobbinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.