Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 19, 1996No. 88510Published

1Per curiam

We have for review a decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

DOES THE DECISION IN [CONEY V. STATE,] 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.1995), APPLY TO “PIPELINE CASES,” THAT IS, THOSE OF SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANTS WHOSE CASES WERE PENDING ON DIRECT REVIEW OR NOT YET FINAL DURING THE TIME [CONEY] WAS UNDER CONSIDERATION BUT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE OPINION?

Caldwell v. State, 676 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We answered this question in Boyett v. State, 688 So.2d 308 (Fla.1996). We acknowledged there that we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Boyett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Caldwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API