United States v. McCracken
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge ERDMANN
delivered the opinion of the court.
Upon consideration of the granted issues1 and the briefs and arguments of the parties, we conclude as a matter of law that under the circumstances of this case, open and notorious indecent acts under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2000), was neither expressly nor inherently a lesser included offense of the charged offense of rape under Article 120, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2000).
In this case the parties agreed that indecent acts was a lesser included offense of rape and the military judge subsequently…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. Specialist GLENN M. BRADLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- United States v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2019
- United States v. HollandU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- United States v. HollandU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.