Legal Opinion

United States v. McCracken

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided July 10, 2009No. 08-0440/MCPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the court.

Upon consideration of the granted issues1 and the briefs and arguments of the parties, we conclude as a matter of law that under the circumstances of this case, open and notorious indecent acts under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2000), was neither expressly nor inherently a lesser included offense of the charged offense of rape under Article 120, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2000).

In this case the parties agreed that indecent acts was a lesser included offense of rape and the military judge subsequently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  5. United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. Specialist GLENN M. BRADLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  3. United States v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2019
  4. United States v. HollandU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  5. United States v. HollandU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API