W. W. Leasing Unlimited v. Commercial Standard Title Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, P. J.
The several closely interrelated cross-complainants which will hereafter for convenience be described as “First California,” have appealed from a judgment insofar as it denies them recovery over against cross-defendant Paul Lyme Sosnowski, for such sum as the judgment requires them to pay plaintiff W. W. Leasing Unlimited, and for their attorney’s fees and costs of the cross-action.
Having read the record, and read and considered the briefs and arguments of the cross-complainants and the cross-defendant, we conclude that the appeal is meritorious.
The questions presented…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chambliss v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Saco Dairy Co. v. NortonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
- Howell v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Myers-Leiber Sign Co. v. WeirichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Resnick v. Abner B. Cohen Advertising, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- ATLANTIC SALMON A/S v. CurranMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Capsavage v. EsserCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Dones v. Life Ins. Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.