Legal Opinion

W. W. Leasing Unlimited v. Commercial Standard Title Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1983No. Civ. 54787PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, P. J.

The several closely interrelated cross-complainants which will hereafter for convenience be described as “First California,” have appealed from a judgment insofar as it denies them recovery over against cross-defendant Paul Lyme Sosnowski, for such sum as the judgment requires them to pay plaintiff W. W. Leasing Unlimited, and for their attorney’s fees and costs of the cross-action.

Having read the record, and read and considered the briefs and arguments of the cross-complainants and the cross-defendant, we conclude that the appeal is meritorious.

The questions presented…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chambliss v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Saco Dairy Co. v. NortonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  3. Howell v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Myers-Leiber Sign Co. v. WeirichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Resnick v. Abner B. Cohen Advertising, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. ATLANTIC SALMON A/S v. CurranMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Capsavage v. EsserCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Dones v. Life Ins. Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
  5. Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API