Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Turney

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to enjoin defendants from hunting upon premises fronting on Cayuga lake of which the plaintiffs are the lessees and claim to he entitled to the exclusive privilege of hunting thereon.

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

The plaintiffs seek in this action to restrain the defendants from hunting upon a portion of the shore of Cayuga lake in which plaintiffs claim the exclusive privilege of hunting by virtue of a lease from the United States Gypsum Company, the owner of the premises bordering upon the lake; the particular acts of which plaintiffs complain are that on several occasions after the execution of the lease on October 22, 1920, the defendants hunted ducks from that part of the lake shore included in their lease and thus infringed upon their sole prerogative.

*400The defendants in their answer in addition…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Post v. PearsallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  3. Rumsey v. New York & New England R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Trustees of Brookhaven v. . StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Chenango Bridge Co. v. . PaigeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. TurneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. O'Neil v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API