Village of Larchmont v. Town of Mamaroneck
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We do not pass upon the question of whether buildings, other than the one specified in the complaint, would be a violation of the zoning ordinance referred to. It is sufficient for this appeal to say the injunction should be limited to the building mentioned in the complaint. To this extent the town should be enjoined.
The judgment appealed from, therefore, should be modified as stated in this memorandum, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party.
Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.
Judgment modified.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Nehrbas v. Incorporated Village of Lloyd HarborNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- In re the County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- County of Westchester v. Village of MamaroneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- County of Nassau v. South Farmingdale Water DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- City of Rochester v. Town of RushNew York Supreme Court · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.