Barkley v. Williams
New York Supreme Court
Demübbeb to plaintiff’s complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.
Defendants’ demurrer is upon the ground that plaintiff has united in his complaint two causes of action which *688cannot be so united, viz.: One cause of action upon contract and another one based upon section 71, Code, for wilful misconduct by the defendants as attorneys in the prosecution of an action.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for the alleged shortcomings of defendants in prosecuting an action for him. Two causes of action are not separately stated in his complaint. It is perfectly well settled, however, that the failure to so state them does not prevent demurrer upon the grounds here…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The New-York and New Haven R.R. v. . Schuyler, Cross, C.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Wiles v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Anderson v. HillNew York Supreme Court · 1869
- Sweet v. IngersonNew York Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by6 opinions
- Astin v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Felt City Townsite Co. v. Felt Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
- Reed v. LivermoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Dworski v. Empire Discount Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Hochman v. New Amsterdam Gas Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.