Legal Opinion

Union Pac. R. Co. v. Bowers

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 12, 1928No. 208PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*790AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). There is little, if anything, to be added to the opinion of the court below. The plaintiff contends that the statute only contemplated interest upon a deficiency of income tax payments which existed at the time of the examination and audit of the returns by the Commissioner, and says that at the time of such examination the tax had been paid in full, so that there was no deficiency, and could, therefore, be no interest due.

The language of the section applicable is:

“As soon as practicable after the return is filed, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seaboard Fuel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goldring v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  2. Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Morris v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Jackson Furniture Co. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Western Maryland Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API