Legal Opinion

Carrols Equities Corp. v. Villnave

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., J.

The motion of the third-party defendant, Eckerlin-Klepper-Hahn (hereinafter called Eckerlin), dismissing the third-party complaint as to it should be granted.

Plaintiff in the main action has sued the defendant, Villnave, for breach of a written construction contract under which Villnave agreed to build a restaurant. The Insurance Co. of North America is named a defendant because of its obligation under a performance guarantee. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was damaged by reason of the defendant Villnave’s failure to construct the building as required by the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. North Colonie Central School District v. MacFarland Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Carrols Equities Corp. v. VillnaveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. City of Rochester v. MacKnightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Larchmont Nurseries, Inc. v. DalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. City of Utica v. HoltNew York Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API