Legal Opinion

Mathews v. National Bank

Baltimore City Court

Decided June 16, 1891Published

1Opinion of the CourtHarlan, C. J.

The jury were sworn in (his case on March 2, 1891; on March 3, 1891, the plaintiff submitted to a judgment of non pros., and on Murch 25th, 1891, an attachment on the judgment for the defendant’s costs, which had been duly taxed by the clerk, $17.50, was issued by order of defendant’s counsel, and the same day laid in the hands of the National Bank of Baltimore as garnishee. On March 26th, 1891, the plaintiff paid to (lie clerk all the costs and now moves to quash attachment, “because the defendants when they cause the attachment to be issued, had not laid out and expended the sum of $17.50,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. JaggersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Blackwell v. Patten and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1812

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API