Legal Opinion
People v. Hale
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 7, 1968No. Crim. 13254PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AISO, J. pro tem. *
By information defendant William Thaddeus Hale was charged with possession of marijuana for purposes of sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530.5) and defendant Anthony Brian Roller with possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530). Their motions to set aside the information (Pen. Code, § 995) were denied.
On August 8, 1966, the ease was submitted upon the reporter’s transcript of the preliminary hearing (together with exhibits) with defendants reserving their rights to raise objections to the evidence and with all parties reserving their rights to produce additional…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. HerdanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. KershawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. GurleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. NealyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.