Legal Opinion

Diamond National Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 24, 1976No. 75-1038PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is reversed. We are not bound by the California court’s contrary conclusion and hold that the incidence of the state and local sales taxes falls upon the national bank as purchaser and not upon the vendors. The national bank is therefore exempt from the taxes under former 12 U. S. C. § 548 (1964 ed.), which was in effect at the time here pertinent. First Agricultural Nat. Bank v. Tax Comm’n, 392 U. S. 339, 346-348 (1968).

Reversed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First Agricultural National Bank of Berkshire County v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. United States v. State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Torres v. City of Yorba LindaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Xerox Corp. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Western States Bankcard Association v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API