Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Goldsmith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 30, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The action is for an annulment.

There are two causes of action set forth in the complaint: (1) for fraud based upon concealment of an incurable physical, mental and nervous disorder, and (2) for physical incapacity on the part of the husband.

*580As to the first cause of action we think that plaintiff adduced sufficient proof to establish that there was fraudulent concealment by defendant before marriage of a serious mental disorder and that the party deceived would not have consented to the marriage but for the fraudulent representation. As to the second cause of action we think there was adequate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gore v. GoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Trovato v. TrovatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. ThigpenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1990
  2. Becker v. BeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Angelo v. AngeloNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hameister v. HameisterNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API