Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'Connor v. O'Connor

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 22, 1985No. 04-84-00039-CVPublished

1DissentCantu, Justice

I do not agree that the divorce decree is unambiguous. Clearly the various provisions cause the decree to be susceptible of conflicting interpretations. Surely the position advanced by the appellant is as equally supported by the language of the decree as is appellee’s contention.

Because the decree is in the nature of an agreed judgment, it must be interpreted as if it were a contract between the parties and the interpretation thereof is governed *156by the laws relating to contracts. Ex parte Jones, 163 Tex. 513, 358 S.W.2d 370, 375 (1962).

The intention expressed on the face of the decree is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gardner v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Labrie v. McKimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API