United States v. Martin Alcantara-Castillo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentRawlinson, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. Martin Alcan-tara-Castillo (Alcantara) challenges his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alcantara contends that a new trial is warranted because the government improperly compelled Alcantara to challenge the veracity of a government witness during the government’s cross-examination and impermissibly vouched for government witnesses during closing arguments. The majority agrees with Alcan-tara. I agree with the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
Alcantara was charged with one count of being a deported alien found…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. SANCHEZ, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Gary Randall Hoxsie v. Dareld Kerby, Warden Tom Udall, Attorney General for the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Jack Alan Geston, United States of America v. Jack Alan GestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Dale Roy CombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.