Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Martin Alcantara-Castillo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 2015No. 12-50477Published

1DissentRawlinson, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. Martin Alcan-tara-Castillo (Alcantara) challenges his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alcantara contends that a new trial is warranted because the government improperly compelled Alcantara to challenge the veracity of a government witness during the government’s cross-examination and impermissibly vouched for government witnesses during closing arguments. The majority agrees with Alcan-tara. I agree with the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

Alcantara was charged with one count of being a deported alien found…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. SANCHEZ, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Gary Randall Hoxsie v. Dareld Kerby, Warden Tom Udall, Attorney General for the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Jack Alan Geston, United States of America v. Jack Alan GestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Dale Roy CombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API