Legal Opinion
Falchook v. J & M Kingsley, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 4, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants 345 Main Street Associates, LLC, 345 Main Street Associates, and Palmer Sealy III appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feinman, J.), dated January 14, 2009, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the appellants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Church v. Callanan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hausser v. GiuntaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Peters v. Trammell Crow Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grier v. 35-63 Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Alleyne v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hevia v. Smithtown Auto Body of Long Island, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012