Legal Opinion
Sudol v. Borough of North Arlington
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 5, 1975PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
137 N.J. Super. 149 (1975)
348 A.2d 216
HELEN SUDOL, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL PERSONS AND TAXPAYERS IN THE BOROUGH OF NORTH ARLINGTON, SIMILARLY SITUATE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF NORTH ARLINGTON, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, THE NORTH ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, AND HEADLEY HOUSE, CLERK OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH ARLINGTON, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided November 5, 1975.
Mr. Alfred A. Porro, Jr., attorney for plaintiffs (Mr. Joseph A. Pojanowski, III, of counsel).
Mr. Frank Piscatella, attorney for defendants.
Mr. Michael I. Lubin, attorney for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wollam v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Alves v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Sigma Delta Chi v. Speaker, Maryland House of DelegatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Wrather-Alvarez Broadcasting, Inc. v. HewickerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Nevens v. City of ChinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tarus v. Borough of Pine HillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Belcher v. MansiDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
- Csorny v. Shoreham-Wading River Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Maurice River Bd. of Ed. v. Maurice River Tchrs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Opinion No. Oag 97-77, (1977), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.