Legal Opinion

Hudgens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Livingston Circuit Court. — Hon. E. J. Broaddus, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ewing, C.

This was an action commenced before a justice of the peace by respondent against appellant, upon the following statement and petition :

Plaintiff states that the defendants are a corporation * * ; and arc the owners of the track, cars and engines known as the Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad; that said railroad passes through said township of Mooresville as aforesaid; that on the line of -said railroad and in the township of Mooresville aforesaid at a point where said railroad was not inclosed with a lawful fence, and where said railroad passes along inclosed fields on both sides, the *419de…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luckie v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Bates v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Cunningham v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. Schulte v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Ward v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Moreland v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Plymell v. MeadowsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API