Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Bridge Rehab, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided March 18, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:15-CV-01528-KOBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARON OWEN BOWDRE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Title VII religious discrimination case comes before the court on Defendant The Bridge Rehab, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 41).

Plaintiff Chenetha Lindsey contends that The Bridge changed her work status from part-time to "as needed" and terminated her because of her religion. She also contends that The Bridge failed to accommodate her desire to share her faith with clients.

The Bridge tells another story. It asserts that it changed Ms. Lindsey's work status because she failed to complete required training and terminated her…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Mize v. Jefferson City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Alvarez v. Royal Atlantic Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Austal USA LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023
  2. Brown v. MGM Grand CasinoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  3. Jennifer Alexa, Jeff Malone, and Tim Rugg v. City of Ann ArborDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  4. Wagner v. Saint Joseph's/Candler Health System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API