Legal Opinion

Janney v. Springer & Willard

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Mahaslca District Court. — Hon. David Ryan, Judge. This is an action at law to recover upon an account for ground feed sold to the defendants. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

It appears from the evidence that at the time the account accrued A. A. Paine & Co., a partnership, were the keepers of a feed store, and that the individual members of the partnership were A. A. Paine and J, M. Janney, plaintiff in this action. W. W. Springer and C. F. Willard were at the same time engaged in the business of importing and selling high-bred horses from France under the partnership style of Springer & Willard. A. A. Paine & Co. furnished the ground feed the value of which is in controversy in this action, which feed was consumed by the said horses. Some time after the account…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. StetsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wile, Weill & Co. v. Denison Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Maxfield v. J. L. Heishman & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Woolson Bros. v. Fuller & SonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API