Legal Opinion

Bolstad v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1989No. C3-88-2259PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

The State of Minnesota appeals from a sentence imposed on respondent that excluded an uncounseled felony conviction from the sentencing guideline calculations. Respondent, on cross appeal, seeks removal of a custody status point and establishment of a lower sentence. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent appeared in court, on a complaint charging him with two counts of welfare fraud, on August 23, 1985. At that time, the trial court advised him of his right to counsel. While respondent never waived his right to counsel, he also did not request counsel to be appointed. Because…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. StilldayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State v. RoloffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API