Legal Opinion

McAleer v. Sinnott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Kings county. Action by Hugh McAleer against Joseph F. Sinnott, individually, and as sole surviving partner of the firm of Moore & Sinnott. From an order of the supreme court directing a reference of all the issues in the action, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWillard Bartlett, J.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover a balance of $4,562.62, which he alleges to be due to him from the firm of Moore & Sinnott, in payment of work, labor, and services done and performed for them, as manager of /their liquor business in New York City, in 1893 and 1894. The answer denies that the plaintiff’s services were worth the amount alleged in the complaint, and avers that the plaintiff has been fully paid the entire sum due him, except the sum of $861.18. By way of counterclaim, the answer charges the plaintiff with violations of his contract of employment, resulting in damage…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. . McFarlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Deeves v. Metropolitan Realty Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Oregon Flax Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Herb v. Metropolitan Hospital & DispensaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Importers' & Traders' National Bank v. WernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Dreveskracht v. First State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Smith v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API