Legal Opinion

Feiertag v. Reichmann

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 13, 1959No. Gen. 47,530PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey

There are two appeals. One is by Katherine Nova from an order denying her petition to intervene in the case of Feiertag v. Reichmann. The other is by Borgmeier and Murphy, attorneys who represented the plaintiff; they seek to continue the suit, which had been voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff, in order to protect their rights under a contingent fee contract.

The complaint, to set aside certain deeds as clouds on the plaintiff’s title and for other relief, was filed April 12, 1957. In October 1957, the plaintiff advised the court that she wished to dismiss her suit. Her attorneys…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hauser v. Security Credit Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Byrne Organization, Inc. v. CantinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  3. Hyland v. 79 West Monroe Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Doyle v. ShlenskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Pierce v. MacNeal Memorial Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Childress v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Anastos v. O'BRIENAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Weigel v. HardestyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API