Legal Opinion
Poole v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 10, 1994No. 92-2617PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIAMANTES, Judge.
Lester J. Poole appeals his convictions and sentences which were entered by the trial court after he pled nolo contendere to a violation of probation and to the new substantive offenses of carrying a concealed firearm and unlawful possession of a controlled substance.1 On appeal, Poole contends that the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress and in directing him to pay a state attorney’s fee. We affirm the trial court’s decision denying the motion to suppress, but vacate that part of the sentence which directs Poole to pay a state attorney’s fee.
Poole…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joseph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Estevez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Poole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994