Legal Opinion

State v. Brin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Defendant and another were arraigned in the district court for the county of Otter Tail, upon the following indictment, viz.: “Louis Brin and H. Malloy are accused by the grand jury of the county of Otter Tail and State of Minnesota, by tbis indictment, of the crime of larceny, committed as follows'. “The said Louis Brin and H. Malloy, on the 13th day of July, A. D. 1882, at the city of Fergus Falls, in the county of Otter Tail, in the state of Minnesota, feloniously topk,…

Read the full summary

Defendant and another were arraigned in the district court for the county of Otter Tail, upon the following indictment, viz.: “Louis Brin and H. Malloy are accused by the grand jury of the county of Otter Tail and State of Minnesota, by tbis indictment, of the crime of larceny, committed as follows'. “The said Louis Brin and H. Malloy, on the 13th day of July, A. D. 1882, at the city of Fergus Falls, in the county of Otter Tail, in the state of Minnesota, feloniously topk, stole and carried away divers and sundry genuine railroad passenger-tickets, prepared for- sale to passengers and after…

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

Gen. St. 1878, e. 95, § 26, reads': “Whoever steals, takes, and carries away any railroad passenger-ticket or tickets, prepared for sale to passengers, previous to or after the sale thereof, being the personal property of any railroad company, or any other corporation or person, is guilty of larceny.” The indictment before us, which is founded upon this section, charges that defendant “feloni-ously took, stole, and carried away divers and sundry genuine railroad passenger-tickets, prepared for sale to passengers, and after the sale thereof, the personal property of, and issued by, the St.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LawlorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Lanz v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  3. Van Hoesen v. Minnesota Baptist State ConventionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Funk v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. State v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. State v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API