People v. Morales
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ritter, J.
The defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree and related offenses. On appeal, he argues that reversal is mandated under People v Sandoval (34 NY2d 371 [1974]) and its progeny (see e.g. People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656 [1992]) because he was denied his right to be present during that portion of a purported Sandoval hearing at which the admissibility of alias evidence was approved by the court. We disagree and vote to affirm.
Prior to jury selection, the court issued its Sandoval ruling. The record reflects that the court began the Sandoval hearing by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. ManoharAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. DelgadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DelgadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.